Best AIFs in India for HNIs: Category II vs Category III

calendar
27 Oct 2026
serviceslogo
JM Financial Services
share
Best AIFs in India for HNIs: Category II vs Category III

An HNI with listed equities, business assets and fixed-income holdings may have little reason to add another product unless it serves a distinct purpose. Private-market access or a specialist investment approach could justify an AIF allocation. Finding the best AIF in India starts with identifying that purpose, not comparing last year’s returns.

Private-market activity adds context: India recorded US$56 billion in PE/VC investments across 1,352 deals in 2024. Those figures describe investment activity, not HNI suitability or future returns. As portfolio-allocation discussions extend beyond conventional assets, AIF selection still needs to reflect your existing exposures and liquidity needs.

What is an AIF, and how does investing work?

An Alternative Investment Fund pools privately raised capital under a stated investment policy for its investors’ benefit. Investing through an alternative investment fund means accepting its collective mandate and contractual terms. You don’t select or sell each underlying holding yourself.

Before committing capital, read the private placement memorandum, or PPM, alongside the contribution agreement. Check the legal structure and permitted assets, then examine tenure, withdrawal restrictions and costs. Some funds draw committed capital through instalments called capital calls; distributions depend on investment realisations and fund terms.

“Alternative” doesn’t mean safer or higher-returning. An AIF may hold private assets, pursue specialist credit opportunities or trade public-market securities. Two funds within one category can have very different loss potential, so category selection is only the first screening step.

The three AIF categories in India

SEBI’s framework distinguishes categories by investment orientation and operating conditions. The table summarises the classification and structural framework described in SEBI’s AIF master circular. Read it alongside subsequent amendments and the particular fund’s documents before investing.

Category

Broad orientation

Possible portfolio role

Liquidity and investor question

Category I

Specified areas such as venture capital, SMEs and infrastructure

Targeted developmental or early-stage exposure

Closed-ended; can you tolerate uncertain exits?

Category II

Funds outside Categories I and III; includes private-equity and debt strategies

Longer-horizon private-market exposure

Closed-ended; when might capital return?

Category III

Diverse or complex trading strategies; may use borrowing or derivatives

Specialist active-management exposure

Open- or closed-ended; what restricts withdrawals?

The category sets boundaries rather than certifying suitability. A private-credit mandate needs different analysis from a growth-equity mandate, even within Category II. The PPM specifies the actual strategy, subject to applicable regulations.

Category II vs Category III: the practical differences

The distinction concerns how the strategy invests and finances positions, as well as how investors enter and exit. Category II AIFs frequently pursue private-market opportunities, while Category III AIFs may pursue active public-market approaches. Neither description covers every fund.

Evaluation point

Category II AIFs

Category III AIFs

Investment approach

Private equity, credit or other permitted mandates

Public-market, long-short or other permitted trading mandates

Borrowing and derivatives

Borrowing is restricted, subject to permitted exceptions; inspect any hedging provisions

Borrowing and derivatives may increase exposure, subject to applicable limits and terms

Structure

Closed-ended; the regulatory framework specifies a minimum three-year tenure

May be open-ended or closed-ended

Exit

Depends on realisations, distributions and contractual terms

Depends on structure, notice periods and redemption restrictions

Main risk questions

Business failure, borrower default and uncertain exits

Market losses, trading execution and amplified exposure

Valuation

Less-liquid holdings can require estimates

Listed prices may aid valuation, but complex positions need scrutiny

Costs

Examine management charges and performance-linked economics

Examine management/performance charges plus trading and financing costs

Portfolio role

Potential access to less-accessible investments

Potential exposure to a differentiated management process

A closed-ended fund’s stated tenure should not become your household cash-flow assumption. Examine extension provisions, delayed exits and the treatment of unsold holdings. For an open-ended fund, check withdrawal windows and any gates that restrict the amount investors can redeem.

Reported volatility also needs interpretation. Infrequent valuation of private assets can make reported returns appear smoother without reducing economic risk. A public-market strategy may show losses sooner because market prices update more often.

Ask who values the holdings and how investors receive explanations of changes. SEBI’s September 2024 modification to the AIF valuation framework reinforces the need to check the applicable methodology. Request sample investor reports, including disclosures on costs and adverse developments.

Which strategies may be worth considering?

The following examples are illustrative, not recommendations or fixed category assignments. Each deserves a separate shortlist based on its mandate. Strategy labels can hide large differences in portfolio construction.

  • Private equity or growth capital: Seeks business-value growth through ownership stakes. It may suit patient capital, but company execution and exit timing can disappoint. Unlike direct listed-equity investment, selling on an exchange may not be possible.
  • Private credit or structured credit: Seeks contractual payments through permitted debt investments. Examine borrower cash flows and security enforcement, including repayment priority. It should not replace readily accessible cash reserves.
  • Value-oriented investing: Buys assets the manager believes trade below assessed worth. Value investment funds may suit investors willing to wait through prolonged underperformance. Cheap assets can remain cheap or suffer permanent impairment.
  • Public-market or long-short approaches: Combine purchases with positions intended to benefit from price declines, where permitted. They may change portfolio exposure, but hedging errors and financing costs can hurt returns. Long-short does not automatically mean market-neutral.

For HNIs comparing PMS and AIFs, the product wrapper is not the investment thesis. A listed-equity AIF may overlap with an existing portfolio management services mandate or mutual fund. JM Financial Services’ AIF investment overview can support initial orientation; fund-specific documents remain necessary.

How to evaluate the best AIF in India for your portfolio

Build a comparison sheet using the same questions for every shortlisted fund. Marketing presentations should lead to evidence, not substitute for it. Where answers remain unclear, pause the commitment.

  1. Objective and mandate: Write down the portfolio job. Check permitted investments and whether the manager can change direction.
  2. Manager and team: Examine relevant experience and investment-committee decisions. Ask about departures, succession and dependence on one person.
  3. Track record: Separate realised proceeds from unrealised valuations. Compare fees consistently and examine difficult periods; use relevant AIF benchmark reports, while checking strategy and vintage-year comparability.
  4. Portfolio construction: Inspect position limits and sector exposures. Ask what happens if the largest holding fails or several borrowers face stress together.
  5. Liquidity and capital calls: Map commitment dates against available cash. Check notice periods, default consequences and when distributions may occur.
  6. Borrowing and derivatives: Establish whether positions hedge risk or expand exposure. Request stress tests covering margin demands and forced selling.
  7. Valuation and reporting: Check valuation responsibility and frequency. Ask how reports explain impairments, conflicts and departures from mandate.
  8. Fees and alignment: Request worked calculations covering all charges. Understand any hurdle rate, the return threshold before performance fees, and how previous losses affect future charges.
  9. Legal, tax and operations: Obtain qualified advice on your ownership structure and tax position. Verify registration, custody arrangements and audit oversight; don’t assume identical treatment across categories.
  10. Portfolio fit: Aggregate exposures across your business and investments. Stress-test capital calls arriving while listed markets fall or business income weakens.

Category II or Category III: a decision framework

A business owner whose wealth already depends on an unlisted company may gain little diversification from another concentrated private-equity exposure. A senior professional with liquid holdings might have greater capacity for a long commitment, but capacity alone doesn’t establish suitability. Start with objectives and cash-flow constraints.

May warrant closer examination

Reconsider when

Category II private-market strategy: you seek a specific private opportunity and can accept uncertain distributions

You need capital back on a fixed date

Category III public-market strategy: you understand its exposure management and can tolerate drawdowns

You expect every hedged strategy to avoid losses

Neither category yet: the portfolio role remains unclear

Selection rests mainly on recent performance

Before proceeding, answer six questions: What should the investment achieve? How much capital can stay illiquid? What drawdown can you tolerate? Where is your portfolio already concentrated? Can you interpret the strategy’s reports? Does your holding period match its structure?

Discuss those answers before choosing an allocation. Existing bond ETF exposure, mutual funds or PMS holdings may already address part of the objective. No AIF allocation is also a valid outcome.

Common mistakes when choosing an AIF

Recent returns deserve investigation, not automatic preference. Check whether gains came from repeatable decisions, favourable markets or valuation changes. Past performance cannot settle the suitability question.

Other mistakes include confusing a category with a strategy and accepting marketing summaries without reading primary documents. Ignoring performance-fee calculations can distort comparisons, while misunderstanding borrowed exposure can understate potential losses. Overcommitting to illiquid funds creates a separate problem: several sound investments can still produce an unsuitable household liquidity position.

Next steps before committing capital

Category II often warrants examination for longer-horizon private-market mandates; Category III may warrant examination for specialist trading approaches. Neither category wins by default. The best AIF in India for your circumstances must match its intended portfolio role after scrutiny of risk, manager capability and terms.

Eligible HNIs can discuss their investment objectives with JM Financial Services before evaluating PMS or AIF opportunities. Bring details of existing holdings and future cash requirements. A discussion should establish suitability, not presume a product purchase.

Frequently Asked Questions

An AIF pools privately raised money under a defined investment policy. Investors participate through the fund rather than selecting each holding. Its category and documents govern the permitted approach.

No. Their operating conditions differ, including borrowing permissions and fund structure. Those differences affect risk assessment, but the specific mandate still determines much of the investor experience.

Either may merit assessment. Category II can match certain private-market objectives, while Category III may suit a specialist public-market objective. A long horizon alone cannot establish suitability.

There is no universal ranking. Concentration, illiquidity or borrowed exposure can add risks. Compare actual holdings and terms rather than assuming the product label settles the question.

Use comparable mandates and measurement periods. Examine net performance alongside losses and realised distributions. Then compare team stability, investor rights and the full fee calculation.

Possibly, if its underlying exposures differ from existing holdings. An alternative wrapper can still duplicate equity or sector risk. Assess diversification across the whole investment portfolio.

Check the PPM and contribution agreement against current regulations. Confirm eligibility, minimum commitment and exit terms. Obtain qualified legal and tax advice before signing.